3 ms·
My understanding is that this particular proof works by constructing a curve over a finite field built of the number to be tested with a "sufficiently large" pr
by nullc 4y ago
My understanding is that this particular proof works by constructing a curve over a finite field built of the number to be tested with a "sufficiently large" prime order, you prove its order by just multiplying a generator by the order. The curve won't work right if the field isn't a field (or in other words unless our candidate is actually prime). The proof has to be applied recursively to prove the order of the test group is itself prime.
Take your pick of redundant WP articles for a more technical explanation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primality_certificate#Atkin%E2%80%93Goldwasser%E2%80%93Kilian%E2%80%93Morain_certificates https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primality_certificate#Atkin%E2...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_curve_primality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_curve_primality
- throwaway81523 4y agoI wonder if the AKS algorithm might have been faster for numbers of this size.
- nullc 4y agoAKS doesn't produce a certificate so it would make the computation much less useful. Verifying a ECPP certificate is faster than running AKS for sure. Someone could go around claiming to have proved numbers prime with AKS when really they just passed strong Baillie-PSW ... if someone ever caught their fraud they'd at least make an important discovery of a Baillie-PSW pseudoprime. :)