5 ms·
Isn't that exactly what most people did with the economy class seating. They modified their plane to transit more people. So this logic still holds. The remaind
by kamaal 4y ago
Isn't that exactly what most people did with the economy class seating. They modified their plane to transit more people. So this logic still holds. The remainder is as simple us understanding what basic structure of a product holds good as a product to sell.
>>It's never, ever as simple as "just trim the fat," because the things you think are "fat" almost never are.
Fair enough. But do trim the real fat.
- woodruffw 4y agoI can't tell if you're intentionally being obtuse or not. The point of the original comment was that "Pareto-style" reasoning here is ridiculous: the engines and wings do 80% of the "work" in an airplane, but you can't remove the rest and expect it to still fly. You can't really quantize work inside of complex systems (like airplanes, or corporations) in this way; adjacent sub-threads in this thread explain why.