3 ms·

I think the farmers use case can totally work as long as those land parcels are also on the blockchain.

• tootie 4y ago
  That whole story sounds a bit apocryphal but even if it's true this is some sort of semi-literate culture. If they're making marks in mud, how are they supposed to encode geographic positions with enough accuracy and write them to a computer system of any kind. And then have everyone understand and agree to what it means. Why it would it be superior to taking a picture and posting it to Whatsapp or Facebook?
• andreareina 4y ago
  The government would have to cede control of transfers, which good luck with that. If you require the government to sign the transaction you now effectively have a permissioned database which doesn't require a blockchain to implement.
• stephen_g 4y ago
  Armed mobs probably don't care about the blockchain though. And shall I lose the ability to sell my land if I or somebody else loses a private key? Shall my land be taken from me if a criminal is able to hack a computer and transfer it to themselves?
  • dilyevsky 4y ago
    The worst part is cryptocow's milk tastes like shit