3 ms·

And that ticket will be forever ignored. On the other hand, if there’s a TODO in the code, someone might fix it the next time they’re editing that part of the c

• monkpit 4y ago
  Your team should be grooming and prioritizing the backlog. If the tech debt exists but the business doesn’t value working on it, then yes it won’t get worked. But it also wouldn’t ever get done as some stray //TODO either.
  • lifeisstillgood 4y ago
    Then don't make it "stray" - parse the code for todos and other lintable items - and yes some grooming is needed - but don't make the ticketing system drive the development- that's the tail wagging the dog, or looking at the receipt at the restaurant and thinking that's what caused the chef to cook the meal.
  • sdiupIGPWEfh 4y ago
    Unless you're in a Scrum team and "The Product Owner is responsible for the Product Backlog, including its content, availability, and ordering." is taken to mean that the PO has the final say on what's prioritized. If your PO has a project manager title, as most do, and they see their career advancement is tied to shipping features on or ahead of schedule, then indeed, that ticket will be forever ignored.
• lifeisstillgood 4y ago
  Thank you .. exactly A team that spends all its time grooming the backlog is not spending time on reading code, logs inputs, output, data etc. We have fooled ourselves into thinking ticketing systems represent living documents but they don't - a high functioning team can have "hey I will fix the foobar by adding a cromulent adjutant" in a office (!) call or even an email. A low functioning team knows no one will get round to fixing it