> Accredited investor structures are a class-based society which I disagree with. This is incorrect. There are now non-wealth ways to become accredited: https:

> Accredited investor structures are a class-based society which I disagree with. This is incorrect. There are now non-wealth ways to become accredited: https://www.sec.gov/education/capitalraising/building-blocks/accredited-investor https://www.sec.gov/education/capitalraising/building-blocks... One could argue that a separate crypto exam would be useful, but I think it's better to just include it in some existing exam as another asset class. > You also imply that it's a forgone conclusion that crypto is a bad thing. I don't. Based on the trash fire of the last decade that would be a reasonable conclusion. But my point here is just that it's unregulated, and therefore has a much higher level of risk, especially to unsophisticated investors.