4 ms·
>> It may cost over $100 million to build a production-quality tool capable of synthesizing code reliably, and nobody has tried that quite yet. $100 million is
by m00dy 4y ago
>> It may cost over $100 million to build a production-quality tool capable of synthesizing code reliably, and nobody has tried that quite yet.
$100 million is nothing tbh.
- samspenc 4y agoWhile this maybe true for FAANG and other tech giants, it is unfortunately still a lot of money for most startups that are working their way to IPO. Tbh even at tech giants that make tens of billions of dollars, a $100 million investment is likely a lot, I'm guessing this sort of investment will require sign-off by CEO or at least VP level along with a solid business plan.
- uJustsaidit 4y agoValue assessment in fiat currency is arbitrary. How many working hours, tons of materials will it take? Could they be used on more relevant needs to humanity? If so, why use them on a moonshot we will die before humanity achieves? Essentially approving burning up resources on unverifiable, perhaps unachievable outcomes? We still fund a lot of agency to iterate on high minded potential as if future humans have an immutable obligation to carry on the work. Secular norms and justifications are not sacrosanct. The dollar is a made up token of power.
- svnt 4y ago$100 million on zero product-market fit is a lot.