> however, it can be negative for the society as a whole. Society wouldn't see the persons tweets, only the followers would. So, it "protects" society, and let

> however, it can be negative for the society as a whole. Society wouldn't see the persons tweets, only the followers would. So, it "protects" society, and lets the follower see the controversy they desire. Or, are you suggesting that the individual shouldn't be allowed to see the controversial speech, because they can influence society? I think there have been far too many examples, in history, where the individual was right and the larger opinion of society was incredibly wrong, for this to be a goal to move towards.