3 ms·
Am I understanding you correctly that you basically want to normalize scams? That we shouldn’t proactively try to protect the innocent from bad actors, rather w
by runarberg 4y ago
Am I understanding you correctly that you basically want to normalize scams? That we shouldn’t proactively try to protect the innocent from bad actors, rather we should allow scammers to take advantage of them even when we know they can be irreversibly harmed?
If I understand you correctly, this is a terribly unethical take, lacking in any sort of empathy. But also lacks any historic understanding of scammers and psychological understanding of human behavior.
This plan won’t work, there will always be innocents to scam, and scammers will continue to exploit it until authorities put a stop to it. There is a reason why ponzi schemes were criminalized, if they wouldn’t have been, we would still see criminals exploit people from the same playbook today.
- monero-xmr 4y agoAs far as I’m aware fraud is still a crime. Authorities have convicted hundreds of people of crypto frauds.
- runarberg 4y agoThat’s not the point. People are still harmed by scams. Many criminals do get away with scams, and even if they don’t, they are often caught well after several successful scams when victims have already needlessly suffered, and most won’t be fully compensated. Here, as in other criminal areas, prevention is always preferable to punishment.