3 ms·

So, specifically what's wrong? It looks no-nonsense and to-the-point. Were you unable to find the information you wanted? Was the site confusing? Or it was j

So, specifically what's wrong? It looks no-nonsense and to-the-point. Were you unable to find the information you wanted? Was the site confusing? Or it was just aesthetically unpleasant?

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
ad404b8a372f2b9 4y ago
Titles would have improved the U.X at no cost. A mailto link might have as well, personally I don't like them but a lot of people find them useful. Also styling for the resume would have improved the reading ease. It's not just a matter of aesthetic, it's a matter of visual parsing.
andai 4y ago
68 bytes (0.07 KB :) <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"> Before and after: https://files.catbox.moe/yfylg0.jpg https://files.catbox.moe/yfylg0.jpg In the pic the text is slightly cut off, looks like i zoomed a few pixels by accident. Still, a touch of padding would improve it imo :)