3 ms·
While I think this is useful, I am skeptical of the numbers given the recent satellite measurements.
by mcculley 4y ago
While I think this is useful, I am skeptical of the numbers given the recent satellite measurements.
- 11235813213455 4y agoit can be twice more or twice less, it doesn't change the answer you got above "Everything is only a small amount of the problem" or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorites_paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorites_paradox
- mcculley 4y agoHow do we know anything is only a small amount of the problem without good measurements? https://phys.org/news/2022-10-nasa-tool-super-emitters-methane-space.amp https://phys.org/news/2022-10-nasa-tool-super-emitters-metha...
- 11235813213455 4y agoSure, animal farming is another large emitter (more concentrated of course, so it's more visible in such pictures than a global trafic of airplanes or cars spread around the whole planet surface), another bucket of sand to consider. It's a global optimisation problem, and everything has to be reduced