> 4. Again, people using metrics to be racist is an argument against measuring intelligence, not against IQ itself. You could make the same argument about liter

> 4. Again, people using metrics to be racist is an argument against measuring intelligence, not against IQ itself. You could make the same argument about literally any other system measuring intelligence. Yeah, the real backlash against IQ is against the implied policy that people think ought to be implemented if IQ is real and determined genetically, as they believe that intelligence is related to moral worth, which raises the question of "what do we do with the worse people if we have a tool that can determine who is a better or worse human." It's a complex mixup of Equity vs Equality.