3 ms·

> wrote the addendum because I knew that some people would be curious exactly why I left Twitter, and also because I did feel like ranting about Musk To me th

> wrote the addendum because I knew that some people would be curious exactly why I left Twitter, and also because I did feel like ranting about Musk To me the "addendum" was the low point of the article. Because it turned what might have been a principled position into a semi-coherent rant about politics, former US president, climate change, and "Muskrat", which in it self resembles the worst kind of twitter threads. I don't understand why people do these things, but just like twitter - your post would also be better without this type of stuff. Just personal opinion. To end on a positive note - I like your apps and the spartan css style of the blog. So this is a friendly message :)

lapcat 4y ago
> To me the "addendum" was the low point of the article. Because it turned what might have been a principled position into It was a principled position, and more important, it was the truth about why I left Twitter. I don't think that omitting the truth to make a better story would be a good idea. It's not honest. I realized after leaving Twitter that I didn't want to go back to the social media experience, but that wasn't actually the reason I left. > To end on a positive note - I like your apps and the spartan css style of the blog. Thanks! > So this is a friendly message :) I'd say it's a mixed message. ;)