5 ms·
Ive used Alexa to order our regular dog food a handful of times, and it ended up being easier to just get my phone out, find it, and buy it there. If there’s an
by seventytwo 4y ago
Ive used Alexa to order our regular dog food a handful of times, and it ended up being easier to just get my phone out, find it, and buy it there. If there’s any background noise, Alexa struggles - TV, music, kids playing, etc. The interactions are super slow.
Voice command stuff won’t be broadly useful to people until they can damn near read your mind. I can translate my thoughts into actions far faster with buttons and a device than I can explaining it to a voice assistant. That’s the real technical challenge here.
Alexa doesn’t have to be better than Siri. It has to be better than me using my phone or a computer.
- zmgsabst 4y agoNaively, a voice assistant with the comprehension of old Wolfram Alpha could be cool: Wolfram used to understand questions like “what’s the mass of the Earth divided by the mass of the solar system?” I think a voice assistant that can take such natural language questions and answer would be fun — asking Alexa is less disruptive to a conversation than taking out a phone; but somehow, Wolfram has regressed and voice assistants never reached that level.
- rpastuszak 4y agoheh, I built sth like this in 2013-14! It was a web app using regular browser APIs: 1. use text to speech to create the query text 2. send the query to Wolfram alpha 3. clean up the response and read it using speech to text I might've used Ivona (a speech to text service later acquired by Amazon IIRC). It worked really well in Chrome and had for a bonus it was designed to look like HAL. (I used the pulsating dot as a loading spinner). Edit: I found it! https://github.com/paprikka/sulik https://github.com/paprikka/sulik
- m000 4y agoYes, not being able to filter out background noise is the one thing that makes voice assistants useless. Whenever I am on the go and tried to get Google Assistant to play me a tune on Spotify, it got it right perhaps 1/20. Worse, around 15/20, it will play me something completely unrelated, that I have no interest in listening to. In the end, I have up on GA, and just stop for a minute, pull the phone out of my pocket and manually pick what I want.
- xyzzy_plugh 4y agoAlexa is the best voice interface for filtering out background noise by a considerable margin, in my experience. It's very flexible in what it accepts. Google is very rigid. Try asking Google Assistant to shut the fuck up. Siri isn't bad but it's too device focused.
- ghaff 4y agoIn my experience, voice recognition isn't really the issue. It's comprehending what you want it to do beyond a formulaic wizard's incantation.
- shagie 4y agoAlexa devices have had some of the most iteration on improving the hardware and some impressive back end systems. The integration with Audible, amazon music, and many other streaming systems is impressive. Part of that is because the architecture is very much the "brains" hosted in the cloud allowing AWS to other service to be better made. Google is very much a "search google" and interact with Google's tools... which don't seem to be as well integrated. The "I want to add X to my calendar" is fine, but things like setting up Sirius XM to stream to Google or the Hue lighting setup was awkward (at the time) and didn't work as well when I was comparing the systems. At one time (it no longer appears to be the case - which is disappointing), Alexa appeared to have a knowledge engine behind it. You could do things like "what color is a light red flower" and then get back "a pink flower is pink". Incidentally asking what color a blue bird was came back with "a blue bird is blue, brown, and red" giving a hint at that knowledge engine worked from some system behind it rather than tautological responses for other silly questions that I asked. Now that comes back with "According to an Alexa Answers contributor..." Asking "Who invented the C programming language" used to respond back "Denis Ritchie" and "what did Denis Ritchie invent" returned back "Denis Ritchie invited the C programming language." This Alexa knowledge engine appears to have reverted to "search Wikipedia." Siri doesn't appear to be trying to be a general assistant and is instead focusing on HomeKit automation and special "this is what you can do with it." Compare writing a skill for Alexa is "write a program and host it on AWS" - but the skills can do, pretty much anything. If you look at Siri "Intents" ( https://developer.apple.com/documentation/sirikit https://developer.apple.com/documentation/sirikit and https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guidelines/technologies/siri/system-intents/ https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guideline... ) you'll see that the standard intents are very limited and in those domains, Siri is pretty accurate on what is done. For general queries, Siri used to partner with Wolfram - but this doesn't appear to be the case anymore. It was a meh integration when it was in place. These differences in how the device behaves comes from some fairly fundamental architectural decisions. Siri is fairly self supporting, even if limited. Alexa has its brains in AWS and as things become less profitable, Alexa becomes less useful for those things. Google has (to me) always been an also ran because I'm not invested in the google ecosystem for stuff and getting responses where it just reads the first page in google searches is boring.
- JoeAltmaier 4y agoThere's a New Zealand detective series (starring Lucy Lawless!) where the main character's name is Alexa. Hilarity ensues.