2 ms·
No but that’s a man made operation. Doesn’t change the origins biological sex. I think rather than trying to change gender from the original biological meaning,
by xcrunner529 4y ago
No but that’s a man made operation. Doesn’t change the origins biological sex. I think rather than trying to change gender from the original biological meaning, maybe (like someone else here said) treat it like a religious identity.
You can have a “personality” trait of masculine, feminine, etc.
- antiterra 4y agoI said women shouldn’t be defined by their fertility. This is inclusive of XX women. You blindly interpreted it as an argument to separate biological sex from gender. The comment I responded to claimed that referring to someone by a biological function such as menstruating was objectifying. I don’t think that follows, because being fertile is not a requirement to be a woman. Further, if all that matters to you to define biological sex is karyotype regardless of biological expression, that is like a religion.