4 ms·

Jordan Peterson’s content is fairly tame videos admit ethics and self improvement - are you describing it as rage bait?

• simonw 4y ago
  Yes.
• somedude895 4y ago
  I can imagine it to be rage-inducing for people who don't like hearing opinions from outside their bubble.
  • mpweiher 4y ago
    Particularly uncomfortable opinions that are usually (not always) thought through carefully and hard to dismiss.
• mhoad 4y ago
  Ummm.. that was maybe true a few years ago but hasn’t been the case for a while now. It’s now very heavily in the angry old man yelling about the degeneracy of society with a heavy political leaning that is a LONG way outside his actual area of professional expertise.
• rsynnott 4y ago
  Peterson got banned from Twitter for attacking a public figure and libelling a doctor. After having recently been temp-banned for attacking another public figure. I mean, while it's not a description I'd use myself (I'd be going more for "Peterson is an arsehole with poor self-control") it doesn't seem that unreasonable.
  • mpweiher 4y ago
    Completely false.
  • nailer 4y ago
    What do you mean by 'attack'? Is any criticism considered an attack? The tweet is question is easily searchable: > Remember when pride was a sin? And Ellen Page just had her breasts removed by a criminal physician.