3 ms·
That’s very narrow minded and incredibly short sighted. Good arguments have a thesis and supporting evidence. Conspiracy arguments have no supporting evidence
by nowherebeen 4y ago
That’s very narrow minded and incredibly short sighted. Good arguments have a thesis and supporting evidence. Conspiracy arguments have no supporting evidence.
- postalrat 4y agoDo you have a thesis and supporting evidence or are you making a conspiracy argument?
- AnimalMuppet 4y agoConspiracy arguments do have evidence. It's just cherry-picked. I think this is the hallmark of a conspiracy theory - out of all the available evidence, this small subset is "the truth", and all the rest is produced by those in the conspiracy, with the intent of misleading us. They don't let the evidence speak; they define all evidence as true if it says what they believe, and all evidence as made-up lies that contradicts their predetermined view. But they do have evidence. And boy, do they want to tell you about their evidence, and point you to their sources.