> really "law" until it stands up to a test case in a court of law. Hence Gingrinch's desire to kick judges he disagrees with out of office. My other worry is

> really "law" until it stands up to a test case in a court of law. Hence Gingrinch's desire to kick judges he disagrees with out of office. My other worry is the possibility of a hostile party successfully preventing a case concerning an obviously unconstitutional law from ever getting to a civilian court. The latest NDAA is designed to do just that. In other words: the courts may no longer be available to fall back on when congress goes wacko. Doom and gloom, indeed.