3 ms·
I dont aggree == conspiracy. Seems to be the trend.
by 32gbsd 4y ago
I dont aggree == conspiracy. Seems to be the trend.
- nowherebeen 4y agoThat’s very narrow minded and incredibly short sighted. Good arguments have a thesis and supporting evidence. Conspiracy arguments have no supporting evidence.
- postalrat 4y agoDo you have a thesis and supporting evidence or are you making a conspiracy argument?
- AnimalMuppet 4y agoConspiracy arguments do have evidence. It's just cherry-picked. I think this is the hallmark of a conspiracy theory - out of all the available evidence, this small subset is "the truth", and all the rest is produced by those in the conspiracy, with the intent of misleading us. They don't let the evidence speak; they define all evidence as true if it says what they believe, and all evidence as made-up lies that contradicts their predetermined view. But they do have evidence. And boy, do they want to tell you about their evidence, and point you to their sources.
- timeon 4y agoYou are dismissing criticism here with shallow formula. Isn't it the same?
- 32gbsd 4y agoa conspiracy theory is criticism. it works the same way no matter which side of the equation its on.