3 ms·
I’m assuming by EPOC you’re talking about Unix timestamps? There’s nothing wrong with them if they’re 64-bit. As I understand it, it seems like it’s mostly sof
by pocketarc 4y ago
I’m assuming by EPOC you’re talking about Unix timestamps? There’s nothing wrong with them if they’re 64-bit.
As I understand it, it seems like it’s mostly software using 32-bit integers that will struggle.
So if you’re writing modern code on a modern runtime running on 64-bit platforms you should be fine (easy to verify by changing your dev environment’s clock).
- LilBytes 4y agoOn recollection there's definitely a non-zero number of 32 bit machines I worked on up until I quit my last job. Out of support, aging 32bit SPARC hosts running 4.6c SAP.
- nibbleshifter 4y ago> Out of support, aging 32bit SPARC hosts running 4.6c SAP. That's production!
- Wevah 4y agoSome (many?) currently-updated 32-but OSS have been changed to use a 64-bit timestamp now, too.
- iforgotpassword 4y agoNah, just switch to unsigned 32bit, much easier fix and someone will probably have figured it all out until that becomes a problem! ;-)
- wizofaus 4y agoNothing wrong? You say that now, but just wait until the year 292277026596!