You can agree that something is wrong, but disagree strongly about why it's wrong. To show standing, you have to have injury, causation, and remedy. You might h

You can agree that something is wrong, but disagree strongly about why it's wrong. To show standing, you have to have injury, causation, and remedy. You might hear about people bring civil cases for violating civil rights instead of wrongful death. This is a legal tactic to get the best changes of a desired outcome. You can see the nature of what NCLA is after in the claims for relief on page 25 and relief requested on page 33. The claims of violations of 4th and 5th amendments and CFAA (counts I, III, and VII) and relief Requested c-g are what I think you're missing. Privacy violation? Fine. Injunctions? Declaration it violated MA common law? Costs, expenses, and fees? Fine. The rest is seeking strategic precedents. It's a part of why they only seeking nominal damages of $1.