4 ms·
The author does. She calls biology a "set of delusions so demonstrably false that even infants can see through them." Then calls trans-exclusionary feminism "bi
by cedilla 4y ago
The author does. She calls biology a "set of delusions so demonstrably false that even infants can see through them." Then calls trans-exclusionary feminism "biology based".
And she literally denies the Dylan Mulvaney being a trans-woman, calling her an "adult biological man". Which is so revealing because trans-woman obviously aren't the reason why some push for gender-inclusive language in pregnancy literature. They don't have uteresus. Only trans-men have them. It's about trans-men.
- bequanna 4y agoI guess I don’t understand this new language. If a biological male either wants to be a woman or thinks he is a woman, I must call him a woman or I am “denying trans people exist”? They can live their life however they want but why are they requiring me to participate?
- cedilla 4y agoYou don't need to participate, but that doesn't make "biological male" any less exclusionary. Especially since it's a nonsense phrase. And even if it wasn't, I sincerely doubt the author actually knows about the chromosomal or endocrinological status of that person Biden spoke with.