> it’s actually excluding the women who can’t give birth Not out of the group of "women", so "Are women who can’t become pregnant men?" doesn't make sense. ED

> it’s actually excluding the women who can’t give birth Not out of the group of "women", so "Are women who can’t become pregnant men?" doesn't make sense. EDIT: and indeed the creepy arguments centering womanhood around periods or pregnancy, which do actually exclude women who can't give birth from womanhood, tend to come from a subset(!) of the people that also are strongly against such language, not the people for it.