3 ms·
>What exactly can we expect all 'humans' to have? And how can we refer to them without making any assumptions whatsoever about their state of being so as to be
by foldr 4y ago
>What exactly can we expect all 'humans' to have? And how can we refer to them without making any assumptions whatsoever about their state of being so as to be 'inclusive' as you say?
This question answers itself, no? You can refer to them as 'humans'.
- jasmer 4y agoActually in practical use, we'd be obliged to use whatever language the individual identified as, which is the new 'subjective' way of being 'objective'. I'm happy to use he, she or they, because it's reasonable and rational but beyond that it's all shenanigans, I have no time for it.
- foldr 4y agoIf you're addressing an individual person rather than talking about humans in general, then yes, sure, go with what that person prefers.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]