4 ms·
Of course, but that is not what I asked. How many people that are born female but have both physiological and social need to be male desire to reproduce in a ty
by krastanov 4y ago
Of course, but that is not what I asked. How many people that are born female but have both physiological and social need to be male desire to reproduce in a typically female manner? That is what I am surprised by. I am sure that it exists, but it would be informative to know how often it happens. And no, I am not suggesting that these people should step forward and speak for the whole group: they should be respected and recognized either way.
- amanaplanacanal 4y agoNo doubt some would be grossed out by the idea. Others might be fine with it. Assuming they haven't had bottom surgery, stopping hrt might be all that's needed.
- eganist 4y ago> How many people that are born female but have both physiological and social need to be male desire to reproduce in a typically female manner? I understand the prompt, but I'll challenge it with the following: Until functioning testes can be synthesized (complete with a chromosome swap, one X for one Y), what means of biological reproduction would they have? We'll defer the distinction between performing this operation rather than keeping the existing set for another day, but for now this question is hypothetical only, so dwelling on it yields nothing. With that in mind, I'd say the question is better posed as: "How many people that are born female but have both physiological and social need to be male desire to reproduce[...]?" and I'd guess the answer to this would be "a lot."