2 ms·
The decision set no burden for evidence, and the dissents specifically pointed out that no reasonable civilian pilot would be flying so low. The court invented
by ch4s3 4y ago
The decision set no burden for evidence, and the dissents specifically pointed out that no reasonable civilian pilot would be flying so low. The court invented this shit whole cloth to justify the drug war fashion of the day, it’s horrifying overreach.
Imagine saying out loud with a straight face that it’s not a search because you’re in the sky.
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> decision set no burden for evidence Defence didn’t allege the cops lied. This case wasn’t about lying cops. > no reasonable civilian pilot would be flying so low This argument has merit. That said, civilians don’t slowly patrol neighbourhoods either. So I’m not sure where the threshold is for what cops can do on patrol.