Few notes: for some reasons we actually really need a paradigm shift, something who happen to be strongly opposed by most regardless of reasons, designs and imp

Few notes: for some reasons we actually really need a paradigm shift, something who happen to be strongly opposed by most regardless of reasons, designs and implications. Unfortunately the WEF public design, who is very poor in details, seems actually really similar to hitler mein kampf and it's well-known not a theory that modern economic theory root themselves in nazism and communism economic models (yes, both, at once). If you hear the not so long speech of the WEF president https://youtu.be/DQjXODh0TOg https://youtu.be/DQjXODh0TOg at last G20 you can CLEARLY see the same ideas of nazism and historical bankster-socialism like the VERY-hard-to-find Clinton Roosevelt "The Science of Government Founded on Natural Law" from the far 1841. His points are essentially: - Industrie 4.0 who is NOT additive manufacturing vs modern CNCs, witch means a potential revolution of neatly nullify waste, but instead the IoT revolution who happen to be "you do not own any tools you bought, the OEM own them from remote"; - Sharing Economy who happen to be NOT a social economy where PUBLIC resources are fairly shared but a private corporatocratic model where very few own anything and "they allow" most access those services, who are scarce, in a shared way; - Corporatocracy or companies who replace States, so autocracy who replace Democracies since a company is not a Democracy. That's the clearly and undeniably nazi part of the scenario. But there is also a technical one. Electrification of anything means a (potential) big simplification of so many industrial manufacturing. For instance EVs demand far less component, far less special alloys, far less precision than ICEs, or they are DAMN CHEAP in industrial terms. Having all electric stuff at home means having a single "power" network and a "signal" network witch is already converged to IP. The same network can power any appliance. Similarly at State level there are just electrical, roads, water and signal networks instead of various kind of pipelines for gas, gasoline, diesel, crude oil, ... witch means a far simple infra to maintain and extend. Similarly a CERTAIN KIND of IoT, the one who happen to be nearly nonexistent so far on sales potentially can trigger big leap ahead in our lives. Some revolutions are formally already there but they fail to scale because of FUD and reactionary-ness of most: for instance WFH might work beautifully well if well done but too many on both sides hesitate and the results are far beyond a positive paradigm shift. Computerization is another: potentially we can hyper-simplify bureaucracy but in 99% of the cases bad design, business interest and ignorance create monsters who complicate instead of simplify. Change that demand a kind of "social reset". The problem lie at management level: such "reset" can be designed by some teachers, philosophers, high culture people, from PUBLIC academic and research bodies with the SOLE target of improving our society or can be designed by a small cohort of nazi thieves for their own personal interests against most AND marginally to ensure social evolution.