3 ms·
Yes it does. Russia's goals was to force Europe's hand (Germany mostly) to certify NS2. First, in Aug. Russia cuts NS1 to 20% citing supposed repairs: "Gazprom
by zzleeper 4y ago
Yes it does. Russia's goals was to force Europe's hand (Germany mostly) to certify NS2.
First, in Aug. Russia cuts NS1 to 20% citing supposed repairs: "Gazprom in July cut gas deliveries via NS1 to 20% of maximum capacity, citing turbine repair delays that it blamed on Western sanctions against Russia because of the war."
There, they say "oh hey but look you have NS2 so why don't you certify it".
Then, they turned it off completely:
"The state-controlled firm disclosed Friday flows on NS1 would be closed from Aug. 31 to Sept. 2 during scheduled maintenance on its only currently operating compressor at a key station, Portovaya CS."
Again, they say "well you can always use NS2". But when Europe didn't bite the bullet and surrender to their demands, they made it even more obvious that the only route for gas would be NS2, by blowing NS1.
If this was UK or US sabotage, they would have blown NS2 completely, while possibly leaving NS1 alone.
Links:
https://www.naturalgasintel.com/russias-gazprom-plans-3-day-halt-of-ns1-natural-gas-flows-to-europe/ https://www.naturalgasintel.com/russias-gazprom-plans-3-day-...
https://www.naturalgasintel.com/russias-planned-shutdown-of-ns1-pipeline-sends-european-natural-gas-prices-soaring-bolsters-henry-hub/ https://www.naturalgasintel.com/russias-planned-shutdown-of-...
- foverzar 4y ago> they made it even more obvious that the only route for gas would be NS2, by blowing NS1. Except NS2 had also exploded. Even if it didn't, can you explain the purpose of this all? What is there to be gained? NS1 had bigger capacity, which meant more money.
- _kbh_ 4y ago> Except NS2 had also exploded. Except it didn't there was a single pipe of NS2 left untouched, if you think it was the US why did they leave a single pipe for Russia to use as leverage to certify NS2?.
- foverzar 4y agoOk, 50% of NS2 had exploded, and the German government doesn't consider the only remaining pipe to be safe: https://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/nord-stream-2-berlin-glaubt-nicht-an-verfuegbarkeit-von-zweiter-roehre-a-77ca3bfe-246e-481f-a276-3cf3fa39adc7 https://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/nord-stream-2-berlin-glaub... More pedantic, but doesn't change my point.
- welterde 4y agoNo. Both NS1 and NS2 have nominally the same capacity. And both consist of two pipes each. Both pipes of NS1 were destroyed, but only one of the NS2 pipes was.