3 ms·
Would you consider using d3.js? I’ve been able to get great performance for large deeply nested trees using d3. It depends on your use case of course.
by equalsione 4y ago
Would you consider using d3.js?
I’ve been able to get great performance for large deeply nested trees using d3. It depends on your use case of course.
- Existenceblinks 4y agoIt's 278.58kB(.min), I'm not sure how good its tree shaking is. I pick every js dependency seriously. Generally libs < 7kB gzip for each.