3 ms·
> If everyone in the world believes that 2+2=5, that doesn't make it less true that 2+2=4 - in the sense that I know for sure But not everyone believes that 2+
by ordu 4y ago
> If everyone in the world believes that 2+2=5, that doesn't make it less true that 2+2=4 - in the sense that I know for sure
But not everyone believes that 2+2=5, isn't it? I mean, if you criterion to separate truth from lies is the reality, then now you are talking about a counterfactual reality without proving that this counterfactual reality is possible. So this your statement is unproven, I'd say it cannot be proved.
I can argue, that if world believes that 2+2=5 then it makes 2+2=4 to be false. Just think about it. Try to imagine a plausible counterfactual reality where people believe that 2+2=5. They probably would believe that succession of numbers goes like this: 1, 2, 3, 5, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, ... And in such a counterfactual reality it would be very strange to believe, that 2+2=4. You could if you liked, and you could build a mathematics around it, but you would have a lot of problems of communication with others.
- fspeech 4y agoIn il nome della rosa William of Baskerville tells us that concepts are signs and words are "signs of signs". In math logic we can define systems of symbols and logical connectives and deductive rules. We can argue for the correctness of a logical system but we can not do it in the same system; we have to go "meta". Similarly a formal system could be a model of something "real", but the correspondence would be beyond mere logic.