>this person HAD to be an insider, no question Nah, that's doubtful. I've seen plenty of posts on HN and elsewhere that held the same sentiment. MANY people sa

>this person HAD to be an insider, no question Nah, that's doubtful. I've seen plenty of posts on HN and elsewhere that held the same sentiment. MANY people said that what they were trying to do was very difficult and they did not do anything to prove they had any technical advances to do it. The company was shady and overly secretive in a really strange way. The board was inappropriate for a biotech company. Everyone with a background in biology or microfluidics said these things. It wasn't hard to find. That's why I was so surprised when they partnered with Walgreens. I thought at the time that Walgreens must know something that the public didn't.