3 ms·

The problem is that these clowns have a lot of political and capital power so their stupid decisions will not blown up only in their faces, but in all of ours.

The problem is that these clowns have a lot of political and capital power so their stupid decisions will not blown up only in their faces, but in all of ours. They have these reductionist beliefs that you can grow meat in vats and somehow have it be equally nutritious than real meat despite the fact that we don't even know basic things such as "are saturated fats bad or not" since each study contradicts the previous one. Or setting delusional deadlines for electric cars without realizing it may not be possible and will just end up making cars 3x more expensive to own. Or connecting to force untested vaccinations to everyone in tandem and when the results start coming in that the vaccines are not as safe as initialy thought they will just ping their media to "forget and move on" to the "next current thing". So even if these clowns think that they're doing good they're gonna blow everything up due to their ignorance and naivety.

nathanaldensr 4y ago
In other words: arrogance and hubris.
- smitty1e 4y ago
  And a natural lust to boss others around.
  - recursivedoubts 4y ago
    libido dominandi
bryanlarsen 4y ago
- readthenotes1 4y ago
  saturated fats are a big threat than sugar?
  - dorfsmay 4y ago
    They both are correlated with health issues. It does not have to be one or the other.
    - oifjsidjf 4y ago
      For saturated fat the problem is that one study says "yes", the other "No". And this still keeps on happening...
      - dorfsmay 4y ago
        Studies that "show" that saturated fats don't have a negative impact on health are typically about tests where they replace saturated fats with sugar or refine carbs and show no impact or even a small positive impact. Replace saturated fat by unrefined carbs, poly and mono unsaturated fat or even protein and you get a huge jump in all positive health markers. Check these videos https://www.youtube.com/@NutritionMadeSimple/search?query=saturated https://www.youtube.com/@NutritionMadeSimple/search?query=sa... If you find a study that you think is worth investigating contact the author, he reviews medical studies for a living and as a passion.
- oifjsidjf 4y ago
  Do explain. Eg for fake meat: if we don't know if saturated fats are good or not due to contradictive studies then what do we know of thousands of other substances in real vs fake meat which have not recieved not even 1% of the study/resources/research resoruces than "saturated fat good vs bad"? How you can find that to be strawman or "wrong" is beyond me. But then again, I've come to the sad conclusion that most researches in the field of nutrition and academia are complete morons incapable of grasping complexity.
  - bryanlarsen 4y ago
    Look at what legislatures do vs what "people" say. Lots of stupid stuff gets said, but in the end the only concrete measures are the continued subsidization of meat and making it illegal for vegan substitutes to be called "meat" or "milk" or similar. That's one of your straw men, that the elite are working towards banning meat. In reality, 99/100 of the elite enjoy steak. They may pretend otherwise when giving speeches to certain crowds, but look at what they do, not what they say.
    - oifjsidjf 4y ago
      Do you know how to read at all? I never even mentioned those problems lol, you're pulling out of your ass things I never said. My point was tied to NUTRITION not to what politicians do vs say. You don't even know how to use "strawman" correctly.
      - bryanlarsen 4y ago
        The topic is "the great reset".
trompetenaccoun 4y ago
Not sure if that's true. Do you think billionaires and state leaders are going to eat vat meat? It's about planning how the majority of people (us plebs) are going to live, it doesn't necessarily mean they want to live like that. And however radical or authoritarian their ideology could possibly become, even someone like Kim Jong-un has plenty of luxury. I think what most of us agree on, whether we're rich or poor is that there are massive environmental problems which are only get worse the more people there are - and in the last couple of generations there's been a population explosion. Now the question is how do we decide what to do about it. The problem with groups like the WEF is that they're elitist and fundamentally undemocratic, not that they're looking for alternatives to conventional meat. These people want to decide for us and rule over us. There is no plan to give regular people agency in deciding our future, it's rich folks, corporations and state leaders (many of whom are unelected or sham elected) planning global governance and the future of our world.

nathanaldensr 4y ago

In other words: arrogance and hubris.

smitty1e 4y ago
And a natural lust to boss others around.
- recursivedoubts 4y ago
  libido dominandi

bryanlarsen 4y ago

readthenotes1 4y ago
saturated fats are a big threat than sugar?
- dorfsmay 4y ago
  They both are correlated with health issues. It does not have to be one or the other.
  - oifjsidjf 4y ago
    For saturated fat the problem is that one study says "yes", the other "No". And this still keeps on happening...
    - dorfsmay 4y ago
      Studies that "show" that saturated fats don't have a negative impact on health are typically about tests where they replace saturated fats with sugar or refine carbs and show no impact or even a small positive impact. Replace saturated fat by unrefined carbs, poly and mono unsaturated fat or even protein and you get a huge jump in all positive health markers. Check these videos https://www.youtube.com/@NutritionMadeSimple/search?query=saturated https://www.youtube.com/@NutritionMadeSimple/search?query=sa... If you find a study that you think is worth investigating contact the author, he reviews medical studies for a living and as a passion.
oifjsidjf 4y ago
Do explain. Eg for fake meat: if we don't know if saturated fats are good or not due to contradictive studies then what do we know of thousands of other substances in real vs fake meat which have not recieved not even 1% of the study/resources/research resoruces than "saturated fat good vs bad"? How you can find that to be strawman or "wrong" is beyond me. But then again, I've come to the sad conclusion that most researches in the field of nutrition and academia are complete morons incapable of grasping complexity.
- bryanlarsen 4y ago
  Look at what legislatures do vs what "people" say. Lots of stupid stuff gets said, but in the end the only concrete measures are the continued subsidization of meat and making it illegal for vegan substitutes to be called "meat" or "milk" or similar. That's one of your straw men, that the elite are working towards banning meat. In reality, 99/100 of the elite enjoy steak. They may pretend otherwise when giving speeches to certain crowds, but look at what they do, not what they say.
  - oifjsidjf 4y ago
    Do you know how to read at all? I never even mentioned those problems lol, you're pulling out of your ass things I never said. My point was tied to NUTRITION not to what politicians do vs say. You don't even know how to use "strawman" correctly.
    - bryanlarsen 4y ago
      The topic is "the great reset".

trompetenaccoun 4y ago

Not sure if that's true. Do you think billionaires and state leaders are going to eat vat meat? It's about planning how the majority of people (us plebs) are going to live, it doesn't necessarily mean they want to live like that. And however radical or authoritarian their ideology could possibly become, even someone like Kim Jong-un has plenty of luxury. I think what most of us agree on, whether we're rich or poor is that there are massive environmental problems which are only get worse the more people there are - and in the last couple of generations there's been a population explosion. Now the question is how do we decide what to do about it. The problem with groups like the WEF is that they're elitist and fundamentally undemocratic, not that they're looking for alternatives to conventional meat. These people want to decide for us and rule over us. There is no plan to give regular people agency in deciding our future, it's rich folks, corporations and state leaders (many of whom are unelected or sham elected) planning global governance and the future of our world.