3 ms·
and to take this in the other direction, TFA> The association between this numeric form and its meaning under the ISA is completely arbitrary P> It's not like
by fsckboy 4y ago
and to take this in the other direction,
TFA> The association between this numeric form and its meaning under the ISA is completely arbitrary
P> It's not like it's just hex codes
The numeric form of machine code, appropriately in hex or octal, is not arBITrary at all, the bits mean things that help group and decode the instruction with minimal logic. In the first example in the article, it's easy to see the registers he's talking about, and it would be easy after that to decode the addressing modes, alu functions, etc.
- rdtsc 4y agoBut they are not listing the hex codes but the mnemonic commands which look strangely enough similar to English, wouldn't you agree? "mov", "jmp", "rdtsc" etc.
- fsckboy 4y agoTFA shows a numeric code in octal, but says that numeric codes are arbitrary. Why should they list arbitrary codes? They're not arbitrary, was my point.