3 ms·
> The people who would be the targets of Stable Diffusion-generated porn, depictions they did not consent to Is it just me finding this notion of someone gener
by geysersam 4y ago
> The people who would be the targets of Stable Diffusion-generated porn, depictions they did not consent to
Is it just me finding this notion of someone generating nsfw content to show it to other people without their consent really far fetched?
It's about a hundred times more likely they just want it for themselves.
The internet has billions of terrible images. If someone wants to spam awful porn today, they can just do it. No SD necessary.
- maxbond 4y agoThere are already communities of people creating & sharing this imagery. The problem is not that people would spam porn. The problem is that stalkers and creeps can & will use this technology to violate people's privacy. Celebrities and influencers complain bitterly in interviews about foot wiki, and try to control what pictures of them are posted to stop people from collecting pictures of their feet. How are they meant to feel about someone being able to push a button and produce a fictional sex tape of theirs? If every photo they post has the potential to be turned into porn, what impact do you imagine that having on people? Furthermore, how are the people making these AIs meant to feel about that? If they want to limit their technology to not produce these images - we're many to understand that as "child abuse"? If I run a porn site and I take down revenge porn when it's reported to me, am I engaging in abuse?