2 ms·
Title seems misleading. It seems they didn't actually pay that much. "However, all this data and processes need to happen on a server and, of course, we used A
by dmak 4y ago
Title seems misleading. It seems they didn't actually pay that much.
"However, all this data and processes need to happen on a server and, of course, we used AWS for it. A few years of growth later, we’re handling over 70,000 pages per minute, storing around 560 million pages, and paying well over $1,000,000 per year.
Or at least we would be paying that much if we stayed with AWS. Instead, we were able to cut costs by 80% in a little over three months with some out-of-the-box thinking and a clear plan. Here’s how you could too."