3 ms·
There's an idiotic paywall, but seriously, does WaPo believe what they wrote there? Seriously as bad as that other paper saying we should probably let ourselve
by coding123 4y ago
There's an idiotic paywall, but seriously, does WaPo believe what they wrote there?
Seriously as bad as that other paper saying we should probably let ourselves get robbed a bit more.
- 77pt77 4y agoI see no paywall. Try the original article: https://theconversation.com/the-case-for-closing-down-womens-prisons-33000 https://theconversation.com/the-case-for-closing-down-womens...
- heurisko 4y agoThe headline is clickbait. The article is mild proposals to rehabilitate, e.g. drug users.
- marcus0x62 4y agoWhat are you talking about? The article proposes, at length, that women’s prisons should be eliminated. I.e., exactly what the headline suggests.
- heurisko 4y agoIt proposes alternative measures for non-violent offences. I see the title as a rhetorical device. > If we can’t close down women’s prisons, we can at least slow down their expansion.
- kevinmchugh 4y agoNo, wapo doesn't, but its author may