>But both those movements were happy to work with them when they appeared to be successful, non-fraudulent billionaires. Yes? I don't understand the point of

>But both those movements were happy to work with them when they appeared to be successful, non-fraudulent billionaires. Yes? I don't understand the point of this statement. "When Alice appeared to donating to her local charity, we liked her, but when it turned out she was lying to us, we didn't like her anymore. We like charity/EA/crypto, and think those are all good things. So when people are doing them, that is good. If they use that goodwill to exploit other people, we don't like that. That is a functioning system.