5 ms·
He's certainly broken YouTube, although I'm curious how much of the explanation is actually legitimate given this channel's prepensity for... being fictitious [
by pityJuke 4y ago
He's certainly broken YouTube, although I'm curious how much of the explanation is actually legitimate given this channel's prepensity for... being fictitious [0].
[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bTJN_XIo8A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bTJN_XIo8A
- routerl 4y agoThe script for this video seems written by an AI or something. The sentence structure is "<state a few facts>, because of this, <other things unrelated to previously stated facts>". He's speaking as though he were explaining something, but he's not.
- bagels 4y agoYes, the explanation of how colors are reproduced in monitors seemed to be completely unrelated to anything specific to youtube, or this particular video, and was just a bunch of words related to the topic strung together in an unusual way.
- UncleOxidant 4y agoThat "the pixels have to agree" part seemed especially bogus.
- DemocracyFTW2 4y agoright? I had to stop watching it about half way in because it became so tedious and nonsensical.