3 ms·
Taking money for a thing that most people would probably set to the default anyway is pretty much "free money" and I wouldn't fault them for taking it. Is ther
by pmarreck 4y ago
Taking money for a thing that most people would probably set to the default anyway is pretty much "free money" and I wouldn't fault them for taking it.
Is there any search engine that approaches the quality of Google search results yet, or ideally, improves on them?
- bogomipz 4y agoSo you might as well take their money because they're a near monopoly anyways and in exchange for that money we will continue to make sure they stay a near monopoly? You don't see anything self-perpetuating in that? Why not duckduckgo or even startpage.com to least have an intermediary if they really care about these things?