The problem is the undue weight given to the opinion of those who show up for editing and debating "reliable" sources, and political purity tests during these e

The problem is the undue weight given to the opinion of those who show up for editing and debating "reliable" sources, and political purity tests during these events. Self-selected editors often don't share the interests of readers of their articles. There's a no-false-balance policy which means the moon-landing-hoax theory doesn't need to get mentioned on every article related to space. Why is your view, or anti-view, important enough that it should be mentioned, such that you'd say it was omitted if it wasn't there?