Sounds reasonable. I'm a bit of a free speech absolutist, so I say no to censorship no matter how insulting the content may be, but that doesn't mean anyone is

Sounds reasonable. I'm a bit of a free speech absolutist, so I say no to censorship no matter how insulting the content may be, but that doesn't mean anyone is required to amplify anything. The argument I hear most often from pro censorship people is that it's not as simple as having a voice, your voice is amplified by algorithms on these sites, you're giving someone a megaphone. This decision appears to solve that problem while not censoring anyone. I'd say a shadow ban would go too far, but just not promoting it sounds like a reasonable compromise.