4 ms·
10 years ago I was at a place where a new CEO came in and fired 80% of the tech team. It was a hard scramble for the surviving engineers, including me, and we h
by lkrubner 4y ago
10 years ago I was at a place where a new CEO came in and fired 80% of the tech team. It was a hard scramble for the surviving engineers, including me, and we had some episodes of being down, but we pulled through it and the site survived.
I think a balanced view of Twitter right now is that Elon Musk has made some mistakes, but in the end, Twitter will be fine, and in 6 months it might be more profitable than ever before.
The pros and cons work out something like this:
con:
Musk fired people recklessly, treating a global workforce as if it could all be treated under California fire-at-will laws. As such, Musk might face lawsuits and might have to pay out some damages. This is not a big deal. He has the money. He can pay.
Musk probably violated the consent decree that Twitter had with the FTC. Again, Musk will probably face a lawsuit and he will probably have to pay. Again, not a big deal, he has the money.
Musk fired or offered resignations to key team members. As such, in a crisis, Twitter may face some downtime. With key people missing, the ability to bounce back from a crisis will be slower than otherwise. But all this means is that Twitter will become unreliable again, as it was during the first 10 years of its existence. Not a big deal: it was popular even back when it was unreliable.
Musk fired or offered resignations to key team members. As such, the roll out of new features will be slower than it might otherwise have been. In particular, his roll out of subscription features will be slower than he wanted.
Musk could have made dramatic changes over 6 months and no one would have noticed except for industry insiders (including the type of people who read Hacker News). Instead, he wanted to reinvent Twitter in less than 6 weeks. This was a mistake, plain and simple. His actions came across as erratic, he made advertisers nervous, and as he has complained "Twitter has taken a huge revenue hit." But this will probably be temporary. In 6 months all of the advertisers will have returned.
pro:
It's likely that in 6 months advertising with be back to pre-Musk levels, but the staffing will be down at least 80%, so profits will be much higher than ever before.
- qwytw 4y ago> more profitable than ever before. Not if all the big advertisers leave... > In 6 months all of the advertisers will have returned Why? If the economy declines ad spending will fall and the industry is more competitive than ever, it's a buyers market. Also most seem to have left because they didn't want to be associated with Musk rather than due to technical/policy issues with Twitter itself. > his roll out of subscription features will be slower than he wanted Which is probably a good thing for Twitter, would move it to the pros parts.
- coredog64 4y agoThe FTC is a BFD. Compliance with it is baked into Twitter processes and has been for a long time. This idea that developers at Twitter don’t understand the requirements and consequences and have been thrown to the mercy of the wolves recently needs to die.
- ryanwaggoner 4y agoThere is a 0% chance that in six months Twitter will be collecting $5 billion in revenue with 20% of the staff they had before. This would be about $3.5 million in revenue per employee, which is way more than anyone else [1]. They simply can't get there without a lot of headcount for eng, infra, sales, account management, legal, etc. Pipe dream, especially in six months. If Elon really is a business genius and is playing 5D chess here that the rest of us just can't understand (like Trump was, lol), then maybe in six years, but not in six months. 1. https://www.statista.com/statistics/217489/revenue-per-employee-of-selected-tech-companies/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/217489/revenue-per-emplo...
- jeffskiling 4y ago