3 ms·
This is a lot of defense, which is sort of irrelevant. All I've said is that Linehan's current public status and notability centers around each of the things me
by woodruffw 4y ago
This is a lot of defense, which is sort of irrelevant. All I've said is that Linehan's current public status and notability centers around each of the things mentioned in his Wikipedia article, which is...exactly what Wikipedia is supposed to be for.
The material content of his positions isn't that important to me; only that Wikipedia doesn't conveniently omit those positions.
- LawTalkingGuy 4y agoThe problem is the undue weight given to the opinion of those who show up for editing and debating "reliable" sources, and political purity tests during these events. Self-selected editors often don't share the interests of readers of their articles. There's a no-false-balance policy which means the moon-landing-hoax theory doesn't need to get mentioned on every article related to space. Why is your view, or anti-view, important enough that it should be mentioned, such that you'd say it was omitted if it wasn't there?