This is one of the dog whistles I mentioned in an earlier post. Women asking for sex-based rights such as female-only sports. An example of this is the LGB Ass

This is one of the dog whistles I mentioned in an earlier post. Women asking for sex-based rights such as female-only sports. An example of this is the LGB Association in the UK. They're a homosexual rights organization and they talk about sex-based rights. They're currently undergoing a tribunal to strip their charity status depending on in their charitable goals match their actions. Wiki editors have gamed what sources are considered reliable until they're all the ones that condemn this organization and none that support them. The article doesn't actually mention any of their words or stated goals, just what you're supposed to think about them ("anti-trans agenda, etc") and the criticism section is even worse. None of the sources explicitly used for criticism is even criticizing their actual words - just the supposedly hidden meaning. > Wikipedia's broader policy of rejecting "softening" labels that groups use to obscure their positions Pro-Up isn't Anti-Down. There's a big difference between pro-woman and anti-trans and trying to "unsoften" one into the other is trying to put words in people's mouths.