3 ms·
> She's also a proponent of mechanically-separated meat how is that relevant? > the animal was killed, so isn't it more respectful to use as much of it as pos
by zasdffaa 4y ago
> She's also a proponent of mechanically-separated meat
how is that relevant?
> the animal was killed, so isn't it more respectful to use as much of it as possible
'respectful' - using that word about an animal you've killed is self-deceit. The animal is dead, and when it was alive it had no concept of 'respect'. Deluded talk.
I also don't get the point of your related aside. My post was about animal suffering, not use of the carcass so it looks like you're changing the subject.
- aerostable_slug 4y agoI'm not sure I can adequately express how I feel about morally exploiting animals (because that's what it is: beef cattle exist to be slaughtered and their bodies exploited, that is their entire purpose and why they exist) to someone who at least appears to be vegan. Similarly, as a hunter what I consider "respectful" you appear to consider "deluded." Arguing over that seems like arguing over religion and isn't something I'm interested in doing today. Have a great Friday!
- late2part 4y agoApophasis much?
- lupire 4y agoA cow has no fear of of death, only of suffering.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]