3 ms·
Indirectly false. Even though we don't use metric directly in most cases in the US, the US customary units have long been rebased to be defined by metric units
by anonporridge 4y ago
Indirectly false.
Even though we don't use metric directly in most cases in the US, the US customary units have long been rebased to be defined by metric units.
Inches and pounds are just centimeters and newtons walking around in a whacky outfit.
- kibwen 4y agoSpecifically, this happened in 1893: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mendenhall_Order https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mendenhall_Order
- kevin_thibedeau 4y agoThe inch wasn't converted to a derived metric unit in the US until 1959. This creates an issue for precision machinery manufactured before the redefinition because the slight difference is enough to matter where allowed to accumulate.
- MiddleEndian 4y agoIf only some governing body had been aggressive enough to redefine NTSC 60Hz as actually 60 fps.
- kevin_thibedeau 4y agoIt was 60fps. Color required an adjustment to prevent stationary artifacts.
- MiddleEndian 4y agoRight, but they should've put in the work to redo things back then so we wouldn't have to deal with stupid refresh rates now lol
- unwind 4y agoWell, isn't that by definition true for any system of measurements? I mean, as long as we're talking about a simple straight-line distance in some real-dimensional space, it's going to be possible to measure that distance in meters (or yards, or whatever). Yes I know about fractal lengths, coastlines and so on. I think the point is that the US customary units are typically used in a very different way, with fractions being way more important than in metric. See the image in this [1] article that talks about drill sizes for DIY use, for instance. You guys go like "oh no the 5/16:ths hole is too small, I'll step up to 19/64ths that should do it". Over here in metric-world we go more like "oh no the 7.9 mm drill was too small, I'll step up to 8 mm". Again, the fact that it's easy to convert the 5/16:ths to 7.9375 mm is not the point, the point is how the decimal/metric units are used in practice.
- aidenn0 4y ago> Well, isn't that by definition true for any system of measurements? I mean, as long as we're talking about a simple straight-line distance in some real-dimensional space, it's going to be possible to measure that distance in meters (or yards, or whatever). Yes I know about fractal lengths, coastlines and so on. The US yard is exactly 0.9144m such a short decimal expansion is highly unlikely when selecting two random units of measurements. It is short because we defined the modern yard in terms of meters, selecting a short decimal expansion that was still "close enough" to the old definition to allow tooling to remain the same.
- anonporridge 4y agoNo. It's true because 1 inch is explicitly defined by the governing body as 2.54 cm, whereas one meter is defined as "the length of the path travelled by light in a vacuum in 1/299792458 of a second". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metre The units of the metric system are defined by physical properties that appear to be constant throughout the universe. The units of the US customary system are defined as some exact number of equivalent metric units.
- programmer_dude 4y agoThis is meaningless. Everything is metric and nonmetric at the same time by this definition since you can always find a linear equation which let's you convert between the systems.