3 ms·
Again, this is a meaningless definition, and not at all what the vast majority of people mean when they say processed. They may not agree on their definition o
by _aavaa_ 4y ago
Again, this is a meaningless definition, and not at all what the vast majority of people mean when they say processed.
They may not agree on their definition of processed in this context, but it sure isn't this definition.
By this definition chewed food is processed because it exposes the carrot to digestion (which itself would be processing).
- torstenvl 4y agoYes. Everything that isn't raw is processed. If processed isn't what you mean by "processed," maybe you should say what you mean, e.g., smoking, adding sulfites, nitrates, sodium, and/or sugar.
- _aavaa_ 4y agoI don't need to provide a definition for what is a nebulous term like "processed" in order to argue that the one provided in the original comment is both ridiculous and not congruent with what most other people would consider processed. > Everything that isn't raw is processed. Likewise, this is a circular definition.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- pessimizer 4y agoYou only do if you want to make that argument successfully. >> Everything that isn't raw is processed. > Likewise, this is a circular definition. No, it is not. A circular definition is that everything that is processed is processed, the one you're carefully avoiding in favor of argument by calling something ridiculous.
- _aavaa_ 4y agoThen please define “raw” and “processing” in such a way that “raw” =/= “not processed”.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]