OKRs are nice for tracking and measuring them, but they do not explain how to achieve them. Trying random product ideas will generate a lot of waste, and will

OKRs are nice for tracking and measuring them, but they do not explain how to achieve them. Trying random product ideas will generate a lot of waste, and will have a very low probability of success. You need a highly-skilled and entreprenerial people to be able to fill the gap from the goals with measurable metrics to strategy, plan and execution. Basically you work like a research scientists, making a series of experiments, until you find an idea which moves your KRs. This is how I see it: Mission Objectives KRs (= goals + measurable metrics) Problems/Jobs/Opportunities (Problem-space, JTBD, OST) Ideas (Solution-space, Strategy, how to achive KR) Step-Projects (Validation/De-Risking/Experiment or feature delivery) Scopes (list of related tasks) Tasks (TODOs) Terms & Abbreviations: KRs: Key Results JTBD: Jobs-To-Be-Done OST: Opportunity Solution Tree Also see GIST (Goals-Ideas-Steps-Tasks) framework: https://itamargilad.com/gist-framework/ https://itamargilad.com/gist-framework/