I don't know if the article does a good job of representing the paper, but if does there are very few and quite weak arguments that in no way explain how UBI wi

I don't know if the article does a good job of representing the paper, but if does there are very few and quite weak arguments that in no way explain how UBI will solve homelessness. They are "less stigma" - ok, but that's little, and "more efficient bureaucracy"- that remains to be proven, but again, not very much. So many questions remain: will UBI create more inflation negating the received money? What else would happen to the economy? How much money should it be considering renting is a big part of normal income? Will the rents go up? And so on.