4 ms·
They are not remotely similar. The old micro usb policy could be complied with by shipping a little adapter with your product. This one cannot be.
by realgeniushere 4y ago
They are not remotely similar. The old micro usb policy could be complied with by shipping a little adapter with your product. This one cannot be.
- Havoc 4y agoAnd thank goodness for that. Nobody wants to deal with dongles everywhere
- realgeniushere 4y agoOkay but that doesn’t address my point or defend yours.
- Havoc 4y agoMostly because I can’t tell what you’re trying to say
- realgeniushere 4y agoMy whole point is that this requirement could suffocate innovation on ports by turning it into a mother-may-I regime in perpetuity. You said, but we had the regime before with micro usb yet still innovated to usb-c. My response was that the old requirement didn’t stifle innovation since it was satisfied by an adapter [requiring a minor logical step by the reader:] because you could still invent new ports as long as you bundled a micro USB adapter. Your response was, adapters bad. Do you see how that doesn’t address the argument at all?