> Edit: from a purely financial point of view, you can make the same argument for companies that do not pay dividends/share repo. Until they actually pay you fo

> Edit: from a purely financial point of view, you can make the same argument for companies that do not pay dividends/share repo. Until they actually pay you for your shares, you’re effectively invested in a ponzi scheme. A corporation still has assets you know. As a shareholder you own a share of them. That said, no one is arguing in support of non-dividend paying stocks here, so what is your point?